Restoring John 3:14-21
Correcting Abuses and Perversions
Introduction:
John 3:14-21 have long been abused by Arminians and freewill cousins for salvation heresy.
They emphasize this verse more than all others to flagrantly reject any conflicting verses.
It is now a reference number, a sound bite, or a mantra for manmade freewill salvation.
Verses for the joy of God’s elect children have been hijacked for their doctrinal nonsense.
God commands honest ministers to divide scripture for the right sense (II Tim 2:15; Ne 8:8).
We do not care about sound bites, no matter how popular they might be with juveniles.
We must determine the sense of God’s words and verses for absolute truth in doctrine.
We follow a two-step hermeneutic rule: (a) what a verse cannot mean; (b) what it does mean.
The first rule of Bible study is to make all verses reconcile with the Bible (II Pe 1:20-21).
This process is started by using the rest of the Bible to bring individual verses into unity.
After all impossibilities are eliminated, we then check possible meanings by other rules.
The flagrant corruption and evil consequences of verses below are truly hardly describable.
The character of God is greatly altered and man becomes his own saviour by freewill.
The purpose, work, and accomplishments of Jesus Christ’s death are ruined for failure.
Consequences are easy believism, evangelistic gimmicks, carnal Christianity, OSAS, etc.
Many Bible verses require the same laborious process to rightly understand them (John 6:53-61; Acts 2:17; 2:38; I Cor 11:24; 15:29; Gal 5:4; Heb 6:4-6; II Pet 2:1; Rev 3:5; 22:19; etc.).
Consider Revelation 3:20, which is used as a formula or mantra for a means to eternal life.
There is not the least mention or intention of eternal life in this Bible verse whatsoever.
The verse is about supping, not saving. It is a call for a local church to seek fellowship.
The verse is addressed to a church … born again, saved, baptized, heaven-bound saints.
We reject the heresy of dead, rebel sinners inviting a fairy Jesus into hearts to escape hell.
#1 … 3:14 or following verses is assumed to be John’s evangelism to save men.
John identified his audience and purpose for writing (I Jn 5:13 cp Jn 20:30-31).
Plural, first person pronouns like we and us are not all men (Ro 8:32; Gal 4:26).
He wrote to believers, as did all Scripture writers, by inspiration of the Spirit.
He wrote that believers might know they had eternal life – not in order to get it.
He wrote that believers might believe even more in order for greater assurance.
He did not write unregenerate with any goal to move them to make a decision.
He wrote nothing about offering life to the wicked, saving lost souls going to hell, or taking the Aboriginal Tasmanians of Australia for God, and he did not ask for you to send a postcard with the date of your decision for Jesus.
He did not offer material wealth, being slain in the Spirit, a problem-free life, a word of faith, a tongues fire baptism, or a laughing revival for trusting Jesus.
He ignored any decisions for Jesus and the mantra, “once saved, always saved.”
This is also our purpose for preaching – the same two objectives as John – to confirm believers as having eternal life … and to exhort them to believe more.
John 3:14-21 and all the Bible is written to the elect as a believing child of God.
#2 … 3:14 is used to teach that dead sinners can look or believe and then live.
This occurs by not reading the very short account for the details (Num 21:4-9).
All the Israelites God had chosen to die by direct judgment were already dead!
No Israelites were brought back to life by looking at the brass serpent of Moses.
Arminians reject man’s depravity, so they deny his death (Gen 2:17; Ep 2:1-3).
But only those Israelites with life, and repentant, were provided a brass serpent.
And only sinners with life, and repentant, can lay hold of eternal life by faith.
The reason for 3:14’s comparison is Jesus lifted up, not a condition to get saved.
Jesus prophesied to Nicodemus He must die a Roman death, not a Jewish one.
#3 … 3:15 and “whosoever” is used to teach all men have freewill to be saved.
They ignore the truth of man’s total depravity and natural enmity against God.
The pronoun whosoever does not mean more than whoever, any one that, etc.
John and Jesus already taught men do not have freewill (1:5,10-11,13; 3:3,6).
Imagine the kingdom of God to be anything you wish, sinners cannot see it.
If the wicked cannot see it, how will you persuade any to spiritually enter it?
Man is given to death and rebellion (Rom 3:9-18; 8:7-8; I Cor 2:14; Eph 2:1-3).
We chose death over life in Eden, including our bodies, but certainly our spirits.
No man can or will believe until regenerated first by God’s sovereign power.
Before regeneration a man is merely flesh and contrary to the Spirit (3:6).
The condition before resurrection by Christ’s voice is death (John 5:25).
The devil’s children among the Jews could not hear or understand (8:43,47).
If a man is not a sheep of Christ, He cannot and will not believe (10:26-27).
The world cannot receive the Spirit, for it does not see Him or know Him.
When discussing salvation with anyone, go first to the rebel depravity of man.
If you start out past this point, you will get in trouble without a true foundation.
#24 … 3:16 is used to teach that “world” means every human ever conceived.
They will not study the word; they assume it to fit their man-glorifying heresy.
The common idea of Jn 1:29; 3:16; I Jn 2:2; 4:14 depends on world meaning all human souls without exception ever conceived world without end.
They make world to be the key to John 3:16 though it never means all men.
John’s use of “world” is loose and requires us to ignore it as definitive itself.
Here are a few examples of John and others’ use of the word world in scripture.
John’s use of world … 12:19 (some men), 14:17 (except apostles), 15:19 (reprobate men), 16:20 (except apostles), 17:14 (except apostles), etc., etc.
Luke used all the world for a very small part of the Roman Empire, which is easily determined by only one factor – the obvious context (Luke 2:1).
Paul used world for the Gentiles as opposed to the Jews (Romans 11:12,15).
What does the whole world mean in both Romans 1:8 and in I John 5:19?
Why do they expand world in Mark 16:15 but shrink the world in Col 1:6?
Giving a sense to “world” is no different than giving a sense elsewhere (Heb 4:12; Gal 5:4; I Cor 9:22; 15:29; I Tim 2:4; Heb 6:4-6; Acts 22:16; etc., etc.).
#29 … 3:18 is used to teach belief is the only condition to avoid condemnation.
But the lifting of condemnation precedes the believing (check the verb tenses).
The condemnation is already in place before unbelief by those not believing.
This is a common argument against limited atonement – Jesus died for all the sins of all men, but men go to hell for the sin of unbelief.
Sorry, the Bible states those in hell are there for other sins (Rev 21:8; 22:15).
Even if they did not sin, they would go to the lake of fire for Adam’s sin.
#30 … 3:19 used to teach all men are ready for heaven until they disbelieve.
Their unbelief is the evidence of condemnation – not the condemnation itself.
The previous verse stated that condemnation was in place before not believing.
Even if they did not sin, they would go to the lake of fire for Adam’s sin.
#31 … 3:20 is used to teach men deserve hell if they are so evil to not believe.
But the verse states that they do not believe because they are already evil!
Man does not have a free will to come to believe on Jesus Christ and gain life.
We ruined any freedom of will in Eden when we chose total depravity of will.
Even if they did not sin, they would go to the lake of fire for Adam’s sin.
#32 … 3:21 is used to teach men believing on Jesus show their love of God.
It is assumed that all men can freely choose to do truth and come to the light.
They presume this heresy in spite of John’s earlier denial of this (1:5; 3:3,6).
Any man doing truth? … can you find any such a man in Romans 3:10-18?
Any man doing truth? … is born again and had it worked in him (Phil 2:13).
Conclusion:
God commands honest ministers to divide scripture for the right sense (II Tim 2:15; Ne 8:8).
We do not care about sound bites, no matter how popular they might be with juveniles.
We must determine the sense of God’s words and verses for absolute truth in doctrine.
It is very frustrating we must spend much effort to undo the ignorance and malice of heretics.
These verses are ours, and I want to reclaim them by the Spirit of our Lord Jesus Christ.
Do you believe on the Lord Jesus Christ this morning? You have been and shall be saved.
Do you believe on the Lord Jesus Christ this morning? We shall see about that shortly.
Are we too harsh? Jesus, like Moses, was angry with hypocrites (Mark 3:5; Exodus 32:19).
Ministers confusing truth should be ashamed (II Ti 2:15), but they are too ignorant to know.
God promised to spread dung on the faces of ministers partial in His word (Malachi 2:1-9).
Sarcasm is appropriate whether Elijah or Jesus or Paul (I Kgs 18:27; Matt 12:1-7; Phil 3:2-3).
They turn the blessed God of the Bible into a begging, failing, foolish, jesting, cruel monster.
They turn His love into the promiscuous offer of a whore that has no substance whatsoever.
They turn Jesus Christ into a pathetic loser that did not finish anything or keep His word.
They turn salvation into a game of gimmicks as to who can make it easiest to get the most.
They add decisionalism to OSAS to justify the most lascivious lifestyles for saints possible.
Rather than sound doctrine, they love sound bites, like 3:16, which they abuse ad nauseum.
John 3:14-21 is about a love that saves, never quits, keeps its promises, wins its object, never changes, guarantees every good thing, does whatever is necessary, and overcomes your foolish rebellion (Jeremiah 31:3; Rom 8:28-39; I John 4:19)!