1 And the third day there was a marriage in Cana of Galilee; and the mother of Jesus was there:
And the third day.
We cannot with certainty prove the identity or sequence of the third day here.
It is not the third in chapter one’s four days; they were in Judea at Jordan.
The guesses of some contradict the preceding context and its easy four days.
It could be the third day after Simon Peter’s conversion, or day six (Jn 1:41).
It is most likely the third day back in Galilee, by context, or day seven (Jn 1:43), because it could easily have taken two days to walk from Bethabara.
However, this does not alter our writer’s intent for us to see Christ’s early days.
Bible weddings did not occur in a church building … like Moses’ tabernacle.
They were not overseen by a religious priest of any kind, including pastors.
They were not religious ceremonies or services with a liturgy as seen today.
They emphasized the groom over bride to match God’s creation ordinance.
They emphasized the groom’s father, who called for the feast and paid for it, who in traditional weddings today is ignored and not even identified.
They did not have all the vain and/or inane customs that are common today.
Today emphasizes the bride’s mother over her father and four given words.
Neglect of parental honor reflects the lack of due honor for God’s authority.
Today ignores the value of a dowry; India’s Hindus reverse it to their shame.
In the lack of a dowry, how can a groom’s character and conduct be praised?
See, Here comes the bride, to, The bridegroom cometh (Matt 25:6; Ps 19:5).
Why in the world does a man get down on his knees to beg for marriage?
A bride emphasis shows insubordination, haughtiness, and lack of reverence.
Most women view this day as their day in the sun – they are objects of glory.
Most brides show far more concern for their dress, their attendants, their guests, the ceremony, the groom’s conduct, etc., than for the groom himself.
Marriage is a practical union that can be initiated similar to employment, for there is no example, precept, or principle for it to be a religious ceremony.
Bible weddings were festive times of celebration, up to seven days long.
Jesus’ role was to replenish wine; the “official” was a master of ceremonies.
Bible weddings made virginity a public thing, like Prince Charles and Diana; and a white dress was to indicate it, but most Christian girls deceive today.
Standing for a bride while the groom looks like a dolt is an idea from where?
Do you think the church will receive more glory than Jesus when in heaven?
The groom’s father escapes both the dowry and also paying for the wedding.
A covenant with appeal to a higher authority should be greatly emphasized.
See the author’s 1990 sermon outline … Elements of a Scriptural Wedding.
And the mother of Jesus was there.
Mary, of the tribe of Judah, was likely related to a family holding the wedding.
Because of her later concern about wine, she may have had a helping role in it.
There is importance in the mention about Mary here, for the heresies about her.
God knew foolish women and wicked men would build heresies from Mary.
From early times, especially women have wanted a female god – a goddess.
The Jews of Israel even fell for such abomination (Jer 7:17-20; 44:1-27).
From the seed of the woman, the devil made her the Saviour (Genesis 3:15).
Mel Gibson in 2004 was shocked that evangelicals loved his Marian movie.
Catholics consider her a co-redemptrix and mediatrix in gaining eternal life.
Are you aware of their heretical doctrines … Immaculate conception? Perpetual virginity? Assumption of Mary? That Mary is more merciful?
Mary is called, among other names …Queen of Heaven, Queen of the Apostles, Queen of the Angels, Mother of God, Door of Paradise, Our Life, Gate of Heaven, Mother of Grace, Mother of Salvation, Second Eve, etc.
Much devotion is given Mary in the Rosary (10 Hail Mary prayers to every 1 Our Father) … Hail Mary, full of grace. Our Lord is with thee. Blessed art thou among women, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb, Jesus. Holy Mary, Mother of God, pray for us sinners, now and at the hour of our death. Amen.
There are shrines throughout the world and in some Catholic homes to Mary.
You could visit BJU’s Art Museum to see Catholic Mariolatry on display.
We answer briefly against their heresies with the word of God demoting her.
Mary was blessed among women, Jael above them (Lu 1:28; Judges 5:24).
The wise men came and worshipped young Jesus, but not Mary (Matt 2:11).
When confronted by a Mariolater, Jesus denied her with truth (Lu 11:27-28).
When solicited by His mother, Jesus put disciples above her (Mat 12:46-50).
Scripture denies her any special role at 12, at Cana, and at His crucifixion.
Jesus called her “Woman,” like friends or strangers (John 4:21; 8:10; etc.).
After the wedding here, Mary is not quoted again; her opinions are ignored.
Before Pentecost, Mary prayed with the apostles, but they did not follow her.
While the apostles are foundation stones of the church, Mary is not at all.
Though committed to his care at Christ’s death, John never wrote about her.
2 And both Jesus was called, and his disciples, to the marriage.
And both Jesus was called and his disciples.
Most likely the family involved was related to Mary, and thus to Jesus Himself.
He had four disciples or so at this point, though not yet apostles, but friends.
Since Mary had some role, she would have included disciples and friends.
We will learn later our Lord’s brethren, siblings, were close by (John 2:12).
This fact here condemns over righteous ascetics that deny such feasts for saints.
Jesus and His holy disciples, serious Christians as much as any, all attended.
Roman Catholic monks, nuns, and priests are not allowed pleasures of life.
The levity of a feast may tempt to folly, but it does not require it (Job 1:5).
Our liberty should be protected from any over righteous killjoys (Eccl 7:16).
Their fake and false humility should be crushed by enjoyment (Col 2:20-23).
Mirth feasts can be enjoyed with the most solemn of themes (Neh 8:8-12).
The worship of God even in the O.T. allowed great feasting (Deut 14:26).
David the man after God’s own heart bought supper for all (II Samuel 6:19).
The New Testament has its own feasts of charity to be enjoyed (Jude 1:12).
Being more conservative than the Bible is Pharisaism, and Jesus hated it all.
Over righteous ascetics and killjoys condemn us for birthdays and holidays.
They are Jehovah’s Witnesses (Russellites) and other overreacting Pharisees.
But Abraham threw a great feast to celebrate Isaac’s weaning (Gen 21:8).
But Job allowed his children to feast every year for birthdays (Job 1:4-5).
Jesus honored the Maccabee’s national feast, or Hanukah (John 10:22-23).
America’s Thanksgiving Day is as scriptural as a national holiday can be.
To the marriage.
As noted above, the word marriage here is used as a synonym for the wedding.
As with all celebrations, it was held where suitable for many guests and a feast.
3 And when they wanted wine, the mother of Jesus saith unto him, They have no wine.
And when they wanted wine.
They ran out of wine at this wedding feast, which is a shame to the bridegroom.
They will ask the bridegroom about it, not the bride, as in foolish America.
Good hospitality requires careful planning to never run short of such staples.
Solomon connected wine and feasting (Eccl 10:19; II Samuel 6:19; Gen 14:18), and it is still an assumed component of most celebrations and feasts even today.
However, Christians will avoid offence where they can to save sincere souls.
We are responsible for the stated consciences of others (I Cor 10:31-33).
We do not want to be the cause of a sincere brother stumbling by our liberty.
We should not ask a person about drinking wine for that is excessively bold.
You are not responsible for those with the errors of Pharisees (Matt 15:10-20).
Hatred of wine by teetotaling Pharisees of Prohibition thinking is irrelevant; there is no Bible basis for their position but their foolish, manmade rules.
There is no Bible basis for their superstition like wine offered to pagan idols, which involved a very real religious compromise in the minds of the weak.
SBC teetotalers go so far as to make alcohol use a condition of membership.
Prohibition compares better to the foolish Jewish washings (Mark 7:8,13).
Jesus showed no mercy to such hypocrites but rebuked them (Mat 15:10-20).
“We don’t drink, smoke, or chew, or hang with those do,” contradicts Jesus.
One Temperance song gloried positively in the mantra, “Touch not, taste not, and handle not,” which idea was condemned as heresy in Col 2:20-23.
Why did Jesus heal on the Sabbath, when He knew it would cause much offence, and surely He could wait until Sunday (Mark 3:1-6)?
Why did apostles eat on a Sabbath (Mat 12:1-7)? Why not prepare or wait?
If you live in a place like Greenville, with many teetotalers, you may order wine in a restaurant; they should not eat in such a wicked place (Hab 2:15).
If you lived near Amish, would you stop electricity and throw toilets away?
If a SDA moves in next door, will you stay home Saturday to read the Bible?
If a Vision Forum / Full Quiver type is nearby, will you conceive annually?
Yet, if you pursue a Fundamentalist, you should forgo wine in his presence.
You should not be foolish or rowdy, or you fulfill their superstition of wine.
Holy and wise conduct, including prayer, presents a godly picture it should.
Believing Bible study allows us to form several senses that satisfy the words.
If this means His time to die (Jn 8:20; 12:23; 13:1), then it had indeed not come.
But such an explanation or application has no place or value in this context.
And such an application cannot allow for any future submission to Mary.
If we take this loosely to mean time to work miracles, it had indeed then come.
He would perform a miracle, though known only by a few, within the hour.
John would record more miracles by Jesus in Jerusalem shortly (John 2:23).
If we take this to mean His own timing for the miracle, then it had not come.
He might wait for all wine to be consumed to protect the miracle’s integrity.
He sought to avoid suspicion of mixing or bringing wine from other sources.
If we take it to mean a ministry of miracles for public view, it was not yet time.
We are slaves to context, and we let the context determine the sense here.
First, we know by context the time being considered pertained to miracles.
Second, we know that He did perform a miracle, so it was not all miracles.
Third, Mary was not deterred, so His words did not deny a related miracle.
Couched in his three responses was enough approval to justify her response.
Fourth, He did not begin His public healing ministry until later (John 2:23).
His later miracles were very public with many begging, touching, or asking.
Fifth, this specific miracle was done secretly with no publicity (John 2:9).
There was no connection of a spoken word and visible change in substance.
Sixth, this miracle is stated to only have value for His disciples (John 2:11).
As Solomon, everything has its proper time, including miracles (Ec 3:1-11).
5 His mother saith unto the servants, Whatsoever he saith unto you, do it.
His mother saith unto the servants.
Mary was not deterred by Jesus’ words to her, so we cannot think them harsh.
Mary was not deterred in it, so we cannot assume Him against a private miracle.
This miracle, and it was a great miracle, involved several separated parties.
There was not the immediate connection of His word and a dramatic change.
Whatsoever he saith unto you, do it.
She turned the matter over to Him and extricated herself from her first request.
They were likely the same servants that had reported to her the wine shortage.
Are you as obedient as these servants that fulfilled His word with blind faith?
There is no better advice or counsel in any matter or difficulty you might face.
6 And there were set there six waterpots of stone, after the manner of the purifying of the Jews, containing two or three firkins apiece.
And there were set there six waterpots of stone.
The details of this verse are put here intentionally, and we should do the math.
The waterpots were used for the ritual washing of things by superstitious Jews.
The waterpots held about 20 gallons for submerging household items in water.
The waterpots would have weighed several hundred pounds (160 for the water).
There is no evidence in the following account of the waterpots being moved.
After the manner of the purifying of the Jews.
The Jews had many washings for purification, some Biblical and others not.
Jesus condemned the Jewish washings and many similar traditions (Mk 7:1-13).
If we add or take away from God’s worship, we make it vain and of none effect.
We must not alter either details or emphasis of His worship (Deut 5:32; 12:32).
Being more conservative than God’s word is no better than being more liberal.
Containing two or three firkins apiece.
Firkin. Used as a measure of capacity, it was about eight fluid gallons. [OED].
Averaging six waterpots at 2.5 firkins, the total was 120 gallons of water/wine.
A wine bottle is called a fifth, because it is one fifth of a gallon, or 25.4 ounces.
Therefore, Jesus supplied them with the equivalent of about 600 bottles of wine.
With a total of 15,000 fluid ounces of wine supplied, 3000 guests had 5oz each.
If only 300 guests, on their second go-round they each had two full bottles. Not!
If the feast lasted multiple days like others, then they had wine for future days.
Leftover wine is reasonable like Noah not taking full grown animals on the ark.
7 Jesus saith unto them, Fill the waterpots with water. And they filled them up to the brim.
Jesus saith unto them, Fill the waterpots with water.
Mary had told these servants to do whatever Jesus requested of them (John 2:5).
Jesus gave the order for one element or substance other than what they needed.
Sometimes you will not understand the purpose or value of a command of God.
You may not see a connection of what God requires and the outcome you want.
And they filled them up to the brim.
These servants, for whatever reason, had great zeal obeying the word of Jesus.
When we have a commandment from God, we must do it with zeal and fully so.
If we intend to do something for the Lord, it should be exceeding magnifical.
If we intend to do something for the Lord, it should be done with great zeal.
We are a rare Baptist church with a Psalter so we can sing Psalms (Ep 5:19).
We got rid of a dry-pastor baptistery in order to be perfect (Acts 8:38-39).
We wait for our children to grow up and grasp discipleship before baptism.
When we must separate from a thing, we avoid even touching that thing.
If N.T. worship should be reverent with godly fear, we do it (Heb 12:28-29).
It is perilous times of the last days that compromise every part of our religion.
Elisha offered Joash victories over Syria, yet he took but three (II Kg 13:14-19).
8 And he saith unto them, Draw out now, and bear unto the governor of the feast. And they bare it.
And he saith unto them, Draw out now.
God will require you at times to do something you cannot see how it will work.
Do you exhort those in financial trouble to give in spite of claims of inability?
Do you exhort all to marry those with great fear of God (Pr 31:30; I Cor 7:39)?
And bear unto the governor of the feast.
The ruler or governor of the wedding feast is master of ceremonies, MC, emcee.
This man by nature of his position would be an expert in wine quality and taste.
For practical guidance, an agenda and leader for gatherings adds to profitability.
And they bare it.
This was great faith to draw out water and take to the ruler of a large wedding.
Are you willing to follow through with a command from God you don’t grasp?
Are you willing to be a fool for Jesus, as in the perceived folly of baptism?
Would to God all Christians could be as bold and obedient as these servants.
9 When the ruler of the feast had tasted the water that was made wine, and knew not whence it was: (but the servants which drew the water knew;) the governor of the feast called the bridegroom,
When the ruler of the feast.
By comparing names and nouns in this verse, a ruler is the same as governor.
The ruler or governor of the wedding feast is master of ceremonies, MC, emcee.
This man by nature of his position would be an expert in wine quality and taste.
Had tasted the water that was made wine.
This was true transubstantiation, but there is no help for RCC heresy here at all.
Their profane and ridiculous hocus-pocus (in Latin) does not alter anything.
Of course, they must appeal to anything they can find in the Bible to corrupt.
In fact, their abominable Mass cannot change the substance or taste in the least.
The governor called the bridegroom directly about the taste of the new wine.
The Catholic host used in Mass has no new taste for there is no change at all.
Chemical analysis done before is identical to any done after, damning them.
This abomination shows the bondage of false religion to deny their senses.
These ignorant souls believe what the pedophiles in pajamas say regardless.
Jesus the Lord had power that Mary and all the priests of Rome cannot imagine.
And knew not whence it was: (but the servants which drew the water knew;).
This miracle was done with some degree of mystery, since it was not identified.
We are not told if Jesus or Mary or no one had told them to not mention Jesus.
This contributes to our understanding it was not yet time for public miracles.
The governor of the feast called the bridegroom.
There is nothing recorded after this exchange, so the miracle was kept a secret.
As mentioned, the bridegroom was responsible, not the mother of the bride.
The servants did not tell the ruler, and he did not tell the bridegroom or guests.
10 And saith unto him, Every man at the beginning doth set forth good wine; and when men have well drunk, then that which is worse: but thou hast kept the good wine until now.
And saith unto him, Every man at the beginning doth set forth good wine.
It was and still should be to serve the best wine first when taste is most acute.
When the palate or tongue is the least dulled, the best wine is most appropriate.
And when men have well drunk, then that which is worse.
After some drinking, the general perception is weaker and the taste buds dulled.
The word drunk here is a verb, and it does not mean when men are quite drunk.
Modern Bible versions corrupt it by saying they drank too much or were drunk.
But thou hast kept the good wine until now.
When Jesus performed a miracle, it was dramatic and extreme to make it clear.
The governor or rule of the feast, an expert in such things, praised the miracle.
Compare other miracles in the Bible that are dramatic and extreme in details.
Abraham revived to father Isaac … then many more by Keturah much later!
Jesus saved His apostles from a great storm to a great calm (Matt 8:23-27)!
Peter and John healed a lame man to walk, stand, and leap (Acts 3:1-10)!
Jesus fed 5000 men with a small lunch and 12 baskets full were taken up!
Jesus waited for His friend Lazarus to die and stink before raising Him up!
The purpose is for us to perceive the glory of Christ and to believe on Him.
If God works in your life, the results will far surpass anything you might do.
11 This beginning of miracles did Jesus in Cana of Galilee, and manifested forth his glory; and his disciples believed on him.
This beginning of miracles did Jesus in Cana of Galilee.
There were earlier miracles performed by God and His Spirit relative to Christ.
The sky opening with an angelic choir for the shepherds was miraculous.
The Spirit descending like a dove upon the Lord Jesus was quite miraculous.
This is the first identified miracle, though kept hidden and secret from most.
More dramatic miracles were only days away, His hour, at Jerusalem (Jn 2:23).
And manifested forth his glory.
Jesus Christ was seen in glory on the mount of transfiguration, but that is there.
This miracle, attested by an expert, the governor of the feast, was truly glorious.
John in his prologue introduced the Word as showing visible glory (John 1:14).
This miracle, if understood and appreciated, revealed the glory of God’s Son.
The apostles beheld His glory, for the miracle was hidden from most present.
And his disciples believed on him.
His disciples already believed on Him for far greater evidence than this miracle.
However, they now had an additional reason for their faith – this first miracle.
And keeping with John’s purpose, we should believe by this written testimony.
Are you growing in faith in Jesus Christ, or is your belief the same as last year?
12 After this he went down to Capernaum, he, and his mother, and his brethren, and his disciples: and they continued there not many days.
After this he went down to Capernaum.
Common in New Testament descriptions, He went down in altitude from Cana.
Cana was located in mountains, a higher altitude, to the west of Capernaum.
Capernaum, being a seaside city at Galilee, was lower in altitude than Cana.
There is much to read about this haughty city in the gospel accounts of Jesus.
This is our Lord’s first place of residence after leaving Nazareth (Matt 4:13).
It was at Capernaum that Jesus healed the centurion’s servant (Matt 8:5-13).
It was at Capernaum that Jesus healed Peter’s mother-in-law (Matt 8:14-17).
He returned so often it is described in scripture as His own city (Matt 9:1).
It was here the paralytic was lowered, and He called Matthew (Matt 9:1-9).
At Capernaum, Jewish tribute collectors confronted Peter (Matt 17:24-27).
It was at Capernaum where Jesus preached a great sermon (John 6:24-71).
He, and his mother, and his brethren.
Jesus had brothers and sisters in spite of what the Roman Catholic Church says.
The great whore says Mary was a perpetual virgin against scripture, which would have been defrauding on her part and caused Joseph great grief.
The KJV Bible declares plain enough Jesus was Mary’s firstborn (Mat 1:25), though the modern versions replace the words firstborn son with a son.
His siblings were known by name by citizens of Nazareth (Matt 13:55-56).
The second cleansing was near His fourth Passover, about three years later.
Two such events add more glory and weight to our Lord’s zeal for God’s house.
Like events occurred at the commencement and conclusion of His ministry.
He opened and closed His representation of God on earth with temple zeal.
At both events He showed His great regard and zeal for true worship of God.
Like the Sermon on the Mount, He tried to reform the false worship of God.
Further differences between the two cleansings help us rightly divide scripture.
John mentions ejection of sellers; the others mention both buyers and sellers.
John condemns a house of merchandise, the other accounts a den of thieves.
John wrote Jesus ordered dove sellers out, the others He overturned them.
Do you trust the chronology of the gospel accounts, of John, or do you not?
The strife was not against convenience for the people, but motive and location.
It is not sin to sell Bibles or books in a church, if done fairly and discreetly.
Other than recovering costs, the price should be very fair without ambition.
Those that sold oxen and sheep and doves.
Travel with animals was difficult, so they were bought for cash in Jerusalem.
This had been prescribed in a passage we know very well (Deut 14:22-27).
And the changers of money sitting.
Money changers were there to provide a half shekel for all visitors (Ex 30:13).
His condemnation was for the covetousness, theft, and disregard for the holy.
It is not wrong to sell Bibles or books in a church, if done fairly and discreetly.
15 And when he had made a scourge of small cords, he drove them all out of the temple, and the sheep, and the oxen; and poured out the changers’ money, and overthrew the tables;
And when he had made a scourge of small cords.
Sourge. noun. A whip, lash. v. To beat with a scourge; to whip severely, flog.
Cat-o-nine-tails. A whip with nine knotted lashes; till 1881 an authorized instrument of punishment in the British navy and army.
The context of this passage is the local church and ministers (I Cor 3:9-15).
Consider the severe ministerial warning of defiling this temple (I Co 3:9-17).
22 When therefore he was risen from the dead, his disciples remembered that he had said this unto them; and they believed the scripture, and the word which Jesus had said.
When therefore he was risen from the dead.
When Jesus rose from the dead, it was the fulfillment of raising up that temple.
Just as He had stated, He rose again in three days, giving the greatest sign ever.
His disciples remembered that he had said this unto them.
This was more than human memory and analysis, especially with those men.
One of the apostolic gifts of the Holy Spirit was to remember (John 14:26).
Another event they understood better was His entry to Jerusalem (Jn 12:16).
And they believed the scripture.
There was clear Bible prophecy of His resurrection from the dead (Ps 16:10).
There was implied Bible prophecy of His resurrection from death (Is 53:7-12).
Further Bible confirmation and evidence of Jesus Christ by the Holy Spirit.
And the word which Jesus had said.
What glorious topics of conversation these apostles had about Jesus had said!
We should also enjoy every word of His; we have their accounts and the Spirit.
Fulfilled prophecy is one of the greatest evidences for the existence of God.
The prophecies that count are not the general, vague junk of fortune cookies!
God used much of Isaiah chapters 41-48 to boast of fulfilling His promises.
Jesus Himself gave His apostles several for evidence (Jn 13:19; 14:29; 16:4).
He wanted their faith confirmed and strengthened after seeing fulfillments.